Welcome to the Other Games Blog.

We have a blog just for Nintendo, so we thought we might as well create this.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Another point of view for the great Halo War

A while ago, I asked the impossible question. Halo 3 or Halo Reach? Since there's just the three of us, I decided to bring in another opinion. But before I tell you his opinion, let me say that for now, the blog has come to a standstill with the debate. I prefer Reach while the Doctor prefers 3 and Terfle has no say in the matter yet. So, here's the guy's opinion. He is an avid Halo player having owned every Halo except for Halo 2 and is currently at the rank of "Hero" in Reach. Here we go:
"First of all, there's firefight. Reach's version is so much better than ODST's because the customization is limitless. And you've got all these great maps and modes right? Halo 3 didn't even have firefight. Next off, forge. Reach is way better, you can phase objects into each other, so you can make pretty much anything. And look at the graphics. They're just so much better than Halo 3's. And, with the multiplayer, you've got these great maps and modes as well as much better playlists. And the amour abilities just make the game more fun and more unpredictable. Single player's pretty much the same though, they're both pretty fun, but with Reach, it gets harder when you have more people, so it makes it more rewarding. And the armoury is just great. it's your spartan. Not just another Master Chief. When you go into multiplayer, you don't change. It's still your spartan"


That's his opinion. Who's next?

2 comments:

  1. someone forgot to mention the game's storyline
    and reach's LACK OF A WARTHOG RUN
    =(

    ReplyDelete